Active Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Caledon, ON
Posts: 7,987
**Please Note: **rwand1 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Re: Should this board be changed to Members only?
Vern
At the very least to enter this forum some basic info is required. Its is very easy to log onto this board using multiple names and accounts.
Not to mention the abuse of Nachi private email. I guess if Nick was getting private emails which concern his family he might be inclined to be more proactive about tightening up entry.
Below is what Roy C posted on CanNachi! :shock::twisted::shock:
Mr. Roy Cooke, from Brighton, Ontario, has made the following statement in a section of this forum.
Roy Cooke
Forum Members
Hero Member
Posts: 704
Re: CAHI INSURANCE CLAIMS LOSS GRAPHS YEARS 1992-2000
« Reply #8 on: Today at 04:06:37 AM »
[/quote]
And Unions !
[/quote]
Marcel
And how about Cults ,I see your leader is praising his members for staying quiet and not making any posts .
Are you now alowed to make post’s on your own or do you still have to ask Bills permision
Gee that is a great group you belong to when the members are not allowed to give help others ask questions or post on other forums. Please make sure if Bill Mullen ever tries to give you cool aid to run and run fast and far, instantly .
**The last time this happened many did not survive **.
These are very serious and malicious allegations that include an accusation of murder. This type of language must not be tolerated. It is salacious, hurtful, incorrect and must lead to his immediate and permanent expulsion from this forum.
Still at I see Marcel ,it look to me like more of your smear Campaign against me .
This just shows how silly you are .
How about putting your money where your mouth is and call Claude’s lawyer He too has tried to ridicule those who have dared to stand up to him and his Conflict of Interest RE the NCA he is also not at arms length from this .
Of course I expect you did again get permission from Bill to make this post like you have previously admitted to doing .
What a way to go through life .Why not just try and help the Home Inspection industry instead of trying to get HIs to spend a huge amount of money to join the secret cult like Group.
You follow me around like a lost puppy then attack .
Posted: Aug 4, 2005 9:02 PM Post Subject:
</SPAN>Gilbert Strachan wrote:</SPAN>rcooke wrote:
When you use a false name you are lying.
I do know who you are and
I am the guy who stuck up for you big time .
Whatever you were sticking up for her didn’t stick very well. She offered to manage the convention, spent a lot of her own time in preparation, to be later told by Nick that he never said he wanted a convention in Kingston. Do you take your BS lessons direct from Gromicko, or by correspondence?
**rcooke wrote:**Gil has told so many lies I have to doubt any thing he says .
I would have supported you and Gil to the end but when I was crapped on and lied about I am sorry but you lose.
***You lying old prick. It was you and Wingnut Wand who got all pissy over the idea that Cam Allen wouldn’t help you get rid of Bottoms. The funny part is that whereas Wand got the boot, Bottoms quit his NACHI membership on his own. Nick keeps you because he admires your ability to lie with a straight face… you’re his Yappidy-yap protege. ***
**rcooke wrote:**I have found out too much more information about Gil that has really
confirmed my opinion of him .
*You’re becoming a bore, on top of being a goof. You haven’t substantiated a single claim about me or anyone else. Posting messages to the effect that I sexually harassed an unidentified woman, or that you think I had one-too-many at an office party in 2003 isn’t getting you anywhere… except to confirm in everyone’s minds that you’re a babbling idiot with nothing of value to speak of. *
**rcooke wrote:**It is too bad we had a great thing going and could be having a
ball having the conference in Canada.
Even bigger then Ground hog day.
*I will not destroy your little game but I am not fooled. *
*Oh! Whoop-dee-doo. Roy Kook figured something out. Give him a pat on the back! But don’t stop there… go ahead and take credit for effort and involvement in something you had absolutely nothing to do with. **You really are a bottom-feeding, low-life, lying old prick. ***
*And the more wild stories you make up, and the more often you claim to not be lying, the more everyone will recognize that you are indeed lying. You’re yap seldom opens without spilling out a lie. I can see why they’re so relieved to be rid of you on the Canuck Forum. Heck, I even have sympathy now for what OAHI had to go through with you. They must party every Friday nite, now that you’re out of there as well. *
You’d best stick close to the “world’s largest education provider” because you ain’t got nowhere else to go, Mr. Yappidy Yap.
Now that proves exactly Marcel is just jealious and sure shows he is exactly what I said doing a smear campain .
What silly little boy still has not grown up. The beauty of this is is in the open section so all who visit the NACHI site can see just what sort of a person he is .
He chased me and made many many silly posts on the CANNACHI site . and now no one has used it to help out industry for a considerable time . Glad to see you have Gil in your cult like association of PHPIO helping you he is one of the best and should be able to give you big help.
Yes I must say Marcel you sure need to improve your out look on life sat hello to Gil… Ask him about the $35,000;00 I heard he tried to con out of NACHI???
You are own your own Marcel Merry Christamas to all .
I am simply responding by quoting previous posts on this forum.
Members can make their own decisions about me and you.
rcooke wrote:</SPAN>Dave Bottoms wrote:</SPAN>**rcooke wrote:**You and Dave still trade stories so glad you know what company to keep .
At least I am a member of a growing association NACHI.
Not shrinking Association like ASHI is, Glad for you.
They look like they are reducing the dues to try and stop some members from leaving.
Please remember to take your pail and shovel with you Dave needs some one to play with
What have I told you, Roy, about dragging my name into your incessant pissing matches? For the sake of your NACHI brethren and this forum, I’m going to let this slide this one time, but don’t start with me.
Now, this reply by me was somewhat cordial. I haven’t made any accusations or derogatory remarks, right? So lets see just how much you respect your NACHI brethren and this forum. Are you able to continue on with your fight without dragging me in further, or would you prefer this to be the start of another huge and useless pissing match?
It’s all up to you, Roy. I’m hoping you are mature enough to continue on without me. This is your big chance to show everyone that you are a team player.
D.
Dave you are still as insecure as ever you tell me I should not mention your name when I am talking to some one else and you the hypocrite that you are add you silly ( NACHI – Where 76% of its members think Raymond Wand lies over 100% of the time) about Raymond. You can not even be fair when you try to (Run a poll) Still trying your terrorism
Lets review:
**
Roy Kook Sr was in another one of his many daily pissing matches with others, bringing down this forum as usual.
**
**2. I, like many others, was watching him make an asshole out of himself, again as usual, but refrained from participating. **
**3. Then, low and behold, Roy Kook Sr just had to go dragging my name into his stupid fight, even though I hadn’t posted a word. **
**4. I then graciously gave Roy the opportunity to save this forum from another huge, embarrassing, and unnecessary peepee match. **
5. And how did he respond? By calling me a hypocrite, insecure, silly, and a terrorist.
So, for all those watching this thread, please think back to this post next Monday or Tuesday, after a couple of dozen or more totally childish and useless back-and-forths that have absolutely ZERO value to anyone at all.
TO RECAP: THIS WEEK’S EPISODE OF THE R & R SIDESHOW AND THEIR CARNIVAL OF CRAP TOUR HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO YOU BY YOUR VERY OWN NACHI MEMBER, ROY KOOK SR.
Until the NACHI leadership can somehow manage to get Roy to grow up, this forum will always remain nothing more than an online romper room.
I believe not, Marcel…They refuse to think about or discuss BC- the province that has lead Canada into regulation of HI’s and which other provinces will take the lead from.
The Three Amigos policy- “SHHH! Don’t mention or acknowledge it…it might go away”. They are still shellshocked about the BC situation (which by the way wouldn’t let any of them work in that province with the credentials they now have).
CPBC took the bull by the horns and quickly brought in regulations requiring HI’s to be tested and certified by orgs recognized by the BC agency** only after** ensuring the orgs had rigorous and defendable credentialling protcols in place…BTW, INACHI didn’t apply, knowing they couldn’t meet the requirements.
**All this was done without answering the IRRELAVENT BIG THREE…**This scares the s–t out of them. A precedent has been set; other provinces will be able to move quickly now as they have a model they can copy and BC to consult with about their experiences and how it may be done better/faster. THAT REALLY SCARES THEM!!
(Note: I know how this process works as I was responsible for the Energy Efficiciency Act and Regulations for 9 years in Nova Scotia. I talked with and gleaned a lot of info from officials in BC and Ont as well as using their documents as starting points for our laws…don’t need to invent the wheel again if it’s already rolling well. That will happen in the regulation of Hi’s also.)
So… they will Squirm, Squeal and Shout (THE BIG THREE S’s) to no avail…their ship has already sailed- They should’ve been watching the BC process closely and used the online public consultation to possibly effect change they wanted…I feel I did with the BC “CONFLICT OF INTEREST” policy!!
You are quite right. Every Canadian Inspector should be scared silly about what went on in B.C. The government was stampeded into accepting, without question, the very same claims and accusations that are being made about the rest of us without proof.
However I can see how you and Marcel are quite happy accepting what is spoon fed to you. Fortunately most of the rest of us are not and we want proof of these claims of incompetence, accusations of being ‘cowboys’ and all the other derogatory statements that have been represented to the government, the press, Realtors and the Canadian public, unchallenged.
If you guys want to bend over and accept the unproven and damaging accusations made about you and all inspectors, that is your business. The rest of us want answers;
HOW MANY INSPECTORS ARE THERE IN CANADA?
HOW MANY INSPECTIONS ARE COMPLETED / YEAR? HOW MANY OF THOSE INSPECTIONS LEAD TO MINOR / MAJOR CLIENT COMPLAINTS?
Without being able to establish the failure rate of Canadian Home Inspectors, then those who have made these damaging and defaming claims have based the entire national programme on a lie. Small wonder that less than 10 % of Canadian Home Inspectors have been fooled into participating in this sham.
Why wasn’t it demonstrated to the world that two inspection trade associations could work together to the benefit of all, contrary to your statement below?
InterNACHI Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Forge, PA
Posts: 23,850
A big thank you to Bill Mullen.
Our recent international convention was a big hit in large part to CAHPI past president Bill Mullen.
Despite all the obstacles thrown in front of him he held tough and demonstrated to the world that two inspection trade associations can work together to the benefit of all.
You keep using these these phrases and accusations loosely and continuously. Please bring some of the actual instances to the boards or direct me to them.
Having difficulty trying to articulate your position? You may want to regroup with Bill and Brian and formulate more sound arguments. Thus far all you come up with given your directorship on PHPIC is your senseless uneducated rants. I think this explains why PHPIC asked you to be a director, they desperately required someone of your ilk to act as the stooge. Someone who is not articulate, someone who can formulate an argument based on facts, someone who doesn’t question the corruption or how the board operates with a President of an inspector mill, and a director who has pleaded guilty to defrauding the Sudbury school district of $300,000.00.
And its also disheartening to see you discourage a fellow Nachi member which I believe contravenes the COE of Nachi. But then again given your ignorance other then your self serving foolishness it not surprising.
[http://www.cannachi.org/forum/Themes/red/images/icons/profile_sm.gif](http://www.cannachi.org/index.php?option=com_jfusion&Itemid=15&jfile=index.php&action=profile&u=230)
[http://www.cannachi.org/forum/Themes/red/images/post/xx.gif](http://www.cannachi.org/index.php?option=com_jfusion&Itemid=15&jfile=index.php&topic=904.msg5163#msg5163) ** [Re: CAHPI/NC TIPR Fraud allegations](http://www.cannachi.org/index.php?option=com_jfusion&Itemid=15&jfile=index.php&topic=904.msg5163#msg5163) **
« **Reply #13 on:** November 04, 2010, 06:49:15 AM »
Legal Action
We have been working on behalf of our Provisional Members that were registered with CAHPI’s National Certification Program and awaiting their TIPR when CAHPI canceled the program. To-date CAHPI has refused our requests to refund your money in full and after several attempts by your executive we are now starting legal action to help recoup your outstanding balance.
We have been advised by the RCMP that this action would be our best approach as a criminal investigation would be unfortunately very low on their priority due to cutbacks and staffing issues nationally.
Our corporate attorney will be filing the required documentation with the courts in early September. If you would like more information on the proceedings contact info@phpic.ca
But Marcel why do you repeatedly spin this story to suit your need to be seen as correct. The fact is that Quebec the province you live in had the highest number of complaints amongst any province.
The facts speak for themselves. Who are you speaking for?
But Marcel why do you repeatedly spin this story to suit your need to be seen as correct. The fact is that Quebec the province you live in had the highest number of complaints amongst any province.
The facts speak for themselves. Who are you speaking for?
Here are the facts. Dispute facts Marcel or do everyone a favour - ferme la bush.
InterNACHI is most willing to work with any other association to the benefit of all. What association provides benefits to the industry that InterNACHI doesn’t? That’s the association we want to work with. Which association is it and what do they provide?
I noticed that some of your earlier time-stamped posts yesterday turned up after my posts were on the boards- moderation must really p— you off!
So Nick has you on a very short leash…SMART MAN!!! Do you have to phone him and tell him “There’s a post ready. Please let it go through.” or is a paid employee wasting his time overseeing Wanda Raymond- threat to anyone around him?
Hope you’re paying him well enough to help him through Christmas, Nick.
PS…Another email from an HI came in very late last night…
"They are quite the pair (Ray & Roy). They go to one board until they wear out their welcome then flop over to another.
It was pitiful how they used to treat that girl from Washington state on there. She was another prize but they were calling her a whore and everything else and Nicky just let it go on. Sad really.
Seems you have quite the history, Raymond, when my mailbox get posts such as this!! Didn’t know much about the girl from Washinghton…care to fill me in?
Don’t weasel out of debating Brian, your spin is turning into more than a spin its a tail spin self inflicted. Don’t forget to pull the rip cord!
Also I would like to debate with you about the fraud that has gone on with the National, not only at the National level but the issues of conflict of interest at the PHPIC level.
