I was asked to post this

[jshishilla (John Shishilla)]

Here it is with some comments(not by me). You draw your own conclusions.

[mmeeker (Michael Meeker, CMI)]

I’am eating dinner but the first sentence sums it up.

Screwing every homeowner they can.

Maybe I’ll have the time to read the rest later.

Thanks for posting that

[phalstead (Preston Halstead, HI549)]

Wow. I am no longer part of that network but bottom of page 3 seems like bribery

[Trisha_Bowley]

My advice to this inspector is to move on. Based on the sidebar comments that were added, it is clearly not a good fit and they are trying to manage him out the door.

[jmurray4 (Jay C. Murray)]

WOW!

I smell problems down the road for ID. It goes along with everything I’ve heard from inspectors working for the company.

I would like to hear if the other WCE have similar issues?

[jdeese (Justin G. Deese, HI517)]

John,

I think this should be sent to one of the many investigative reporters covering the sham that is the re-inspection program.

Just my humble opinion.

[phalstead (Preston Halstead, HI549)]

@Trisha_Bowley

My advice to this inspector is to move on. Based on the sidebar comments that were added, it is clearly not a good fit and they are trying to manage him out the door.

Trisha, forget about the side comments. You dont see anything wrong with the statements made, especially on the bottom of page 3? This appears to be an official company bulletin. I cant tell for sure as i left this network due to things I am not ready to voice here but both Citizens and an numerous attorneys are looking into things like this from what I hear.

[jmurray4 (Jay C. Murray)]

@Trisha_Bowley

My advice to this inspector is to move on. Based on the sidebar comments that were added, it is clearly not a good fit and they are trying to manage him out the door.

Honestly Trish, your a good sport and do provide some interesting commentary. But, you should have some disclaimers running below your posts like…

…Industry paid spokesperson…propaganda producer…fiction writer…Drinker of koolaide…Spin doctor…

Do they pay by the post or the letter?

[phalstead (Preston Halstead, HI549)]

I Think it says it all in the posted tech bulletin. If you allow ID to charge you extra fees they will return the favor and give you more inspections. Read page 3. That is crazy. Is that legal?

[dduffy (Dale Duffy)]

@jshishilla

Here it is with some comments(not by me). You draw your own conclusions.

Hi John,

I thank God I don’t live in Florida doing this nonsense, but this is so bizarre the state attorney general should be looking into this mockery.

[jmurray4 (Jay C. Murray)]

How do they refer to this, “Team Players”?

[dduffy (Dale Duffy)]

@jmurray4

How do they refer to this, “Team Players”?

Wink Wink…:shock:

Or Oik Oik…:shock:

[staylor3 (Steven Taylor)]

@dduffy

Hi John,

I thank God I don’t live in Florida doing this nonsense, but this is so bizarre the state attorney general should be looking into this mockery.

The AG sits on the Board of Department of Financial Services. The Dept. of Financial Services governs Citizens. Unfortunately, the AG is part of the problem. This will only get resolved through civil action (litigation and/or class action). Don’t look for elected officials to do the right thing with respect to this issue (Citizens- and the insurance industry). There is way too much money, power, and influence involved- and they are all in bed together on this one.

[phalstead (Preston Halstead, HI549)]

@staylor3

The AG sits on the Board of Department of Financial Services. The Dept. of Financial Services governs Citizens. Unfortunately, the AG is part of the problem. This will only get resolved through civil action (litigation and/or class action). Don’t look for elected officials to do the right thing with respect to this issue (Citizens- and the insurance industry). There is way too much money, power, and influence involved- and they are all in bed together on this one.

From what I understand there are attorneys no building a case with no out of pocket costs to inspectors to expose things like this and collect monies owed, fees charged, and interest. Inspectors just need to contact one of these attorneys

[thession (Thomas Hession, NACHI10011411)]

Thanx John…this is what is needed to pursue an investigation. Please guys and gals there is a lot more out there. Send your comments, experience, documentation to

“Jay Neal” <jneal@floridainsurancereform.org>, “Jay Neal” <jneal@floridainsurancereform.org>,](“Jay Neal” <jneal@floridainsurancereform.org>,)

[fsylvester (Fred Sylvester, HI-278 CB-C025051 MRSA-911 MRSR-1017)]

@staylor3

the ag sits on the board of department of financial services. The dept. Of financial services governs citizens. Unfortunately, the ag is part of the problem. This will only get resolved through civil action (litigation and/or class action). Don’t look for elected officials to do the right thing with respect to this issue (citizens- and the insurance industry). There is way too much money, power, and influence involved- and they are all in bed together on this one.

bingo

[jshishilla (John Shishilla)]

@jdeese

John,

I think this should be sent to one of the many investigative reporters covering the sham that is the re-inspection program.

Just my humble opinion.

I did some re-inspections and can tell you first hand. One long time inspector told me in the beginning, “if you are going to work with ‘them’ keep one hand on your wallet.”

[evandeven (Eric Van De Ven, CMI)]

@phalstead

Trisha, forget about the side comments. You dont see anything wrong with the statements made, especially on the bottom of page 3? This appears to be an official company bulletin. I cant tell for sure as i left this network due to things I am not ready to voice here but both Citizens and an numerous attorneys are looking into things like this from what I hear.

I would agree with you Preston, scratch our back…

If our Account Managers are going over and above to make sure you have all the inspections you
can handle in the assignment process, all we ask is that you return the favor and participate in the
scheduling of maybe 1 or 2 additional inspections a week that comes through our office. I am
positive your Account Manager will make up for any
inconvenience in the long term for the team
players involved in
our scheduling program.

This, if they are trying to say you are a sub contractor, but can only use ID on the reports, will land them in hot water.
Sort of what happened to these guys (see attached)

If you are conducting any work associated with Inspection Depot, at no time during the
inspection, or afterwards, must any inspection company’s name, other than Inspection Depot, be
mentioned or forwarded to the client or policyholder. This is not permitted. We have already
had calls from policyholders asking why contractors or other inspectors are not approved by
Citizens, because they provided information about their own contracting or inspection company.
If you are providing any other name other than Inspection Depot, please cease this immediately
to prevent any further issues.

[Trisha_Bowley]

What the tech bulletin says or doesn’t say, or my comments pertaining to it, are not for public broadcast.

What I’m getting really sick of, is the disgruntled inspectors making it sound like every inspector involved in this program feel the same. They are going to ruin it for others who are content and making money.

There are always more happy customers than unhappy “customers” (or inspectors in this case), but it’s always the unhappy ones that make all the noise.

[gwilliams3 (Jerry Williams)]

I received numerous marketing emails from this organization. I was initially skeptical. After one phone call to them I knew I didn’t want to have anything to do with them.

Inspector beware.