Originally Posted By: Nick Gromicko
This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Again guys,
There is no NACHI involvement or connection here. As some of you know, I sit on many boards and have interests in many corporations involved in many industries in many different areas of the country. NACHI takes up 95% of my time, but I'm into all sorts of stuff from mining operations to patents on golf tees. This civil battle does not involve NACHI. As a matter of fact it doesn't even involve me in any real way other than I made $50,000.00 on my shares of the stock when I sold them. It is a civil judgement against the stockholders of a corporation of which I haven't been one in 10 years. As former stockholder, I don't even have access to the records of this corporation.
I'm sure that no inspector out there reading these words, who sells his incorporated home inspection business and retires, would agree that someone who looks up the public record years later, discovers the inspector was the original incorporator of the home inspection company, and assuming that meant he was the sole stockholder, should be able to file a civil complaint against that inspector. It is a matter of principle.
You can look at it subjectively any way you want but the order of our complaints says everything:
Michael Pyles only filed this civil complaint against the former stockholders of that corporation long AFTER I sued him. That's right, the publicly recorded suit (mine, not his) is "Gromicko vs. PADEP", not the other way around (plaintiffs are listed first, defendants are listed second). In fact there isn't a PADEP vs. Gromicko... it doesn't exist. I took him to court, he didn't take me. Only afterwards did he misuse his office to pull this ex-stockholder complaint crap in an effort to get me to drop my suit or settle it. Those of you that know me well know that I would refuse such a sleazy deal and so did refuse, and still refuse. Don't believe me, look at the order of the two complaints.
I like drama so here goes...
I'll pay anyone twice their entire civil complaint amount in cash (green twenties), hand delivered in a brief case, to anyone who can refute my claim that Michael Pyles filed his complaint only AFTER I filed Gromicko vs. PADEP against him. The order says everything about him... and me.
Oh, and you can keep the brief case too... ![icon_lol.gif](upload://zEgbBCXRskkCTwEux7Bi20ZySza.gif)
--
Nick Gromicko
Founder
dues=79cents/day.
I much prefer email to private messages.