What’s the total cost?
- FEES are listed on the following page and on webpage:
http://www.nationalhomeinspector.org/NHICCFee11.pdf
Too pricey in lieu of the top designation in Canada ( Certified Master Inspector ) being $1,000.
Since CMI (the highest professional designation in the inspection industry) is only $1,000 total, all the lesser designations must be lesser in price as well.
http://www.nationalhomeinspector.org/NHICCFee11.pdf
Thanks Ray
Since CMI (the highest professional designation in the inspection industry) is only $1,000 total, all the lesser designations must be lesser in price as well.
The CMI is a one time payment and is easier for the public to understand that CMI is superiour.
I guess your friend Raymond doesn’t know what he talking about then. Is Raymond lying when he posted this on the ACHI forum, Roy ??
For once, I fully agree with Raymond.
As for the CMI being superior, (LMAO) if that is so, why is it only approved in one province when the NHI by the NHICC is approved in all provinces that have licensed inspectors ??
Now before you lash out at me, Roy, please let us know if you agree or disagree with Raymond, because if anyone else said those things abour Nick and NACHI, you would ne stalking them and trying to ruin their name.
Raymond said:
**Nachi **
All I can say are there from appearances many naive home inspectors on the Nachi site, who quite frankly buy into everything Nick says and does.
The fact remains anyone gullible enough to believe Nachi is an accrediting association is sadly mistaken. Its nothing but an promoting, quasi educational machine designed to hood wink members into thinking that by being a member and doing a simple online test makes them qualified.
Nick also says one thing to your face and then does something completely different.
The fact one member who claims to be a former teacher of home inspection courses in Sault Ste. Marie quoted the following on Nachi.
I agree and disagree with you. Problem in Ontario is you do not need to be a super human to be a Code Inspector.
I think they should be required to do what we as HI’s have to do and not just a open book test.:sad:
They should all be former Inspectors with a least 5 years of HI and not be paid what they do. Maybe then we might not have them fighting against us.
The fact remains regardless what he thinks Code Inspectors become qualified the minute they pass the open book proctored test. Even more poignant is the fact like home inspectors there are good and bad code inspectors who also report to their municipality, unlike inspectors in Ontario who report to know one.
And this person wants to teach other home inspectors? Now I think I understand why Mike Holmes was used to endorse the CD course in the Sault.
I have given up on Nachi and apparently so have many others who I assume realize its nothing but a bunch of vendors plying their wares.** Nothing will convince me this much touted CMI is anything but a fraud.**
**Someone is Alberta must have been paid off given who sits on the CMI board of directors! **
Really this was said?
Every word, five days ago, by Raymond Wand, on another forum.
Bill Mullen
Bill, you are mistaken again.
Your NCP, NCA, NHICC, or whatever you are calling it this week… had to recently seek approval from the licensing agency, much like other schools have to. You are now on par with Inspect4U (already approved). CMI didn’t have to apply. CMI was pre-grandfathered in the law itself.
You are the one who likes to infer what governmental actions say about certain professional designations. What does that say?
Strange how Bill expects me to answer his questions when he is a master at not answering questions .
Sorry Bill you are in need of cleaning up your bad attitude before you try and improve on what you say others say .
I have no idea what Raymond or others said before he made the post above.
I do know how you have been for the last many years and it has been extremely poor for a long time .
You should be ashamed how you have refused to give information .
You should be ashamed the way you communicate as a leader you do a very poor job of posting and refusing to see your own faults .
It is disgusting to see some one who should be leading ,helping,and supplying information.
Thanks for your many lies and insults over the years .
This is not the way Normal Canadians communicate.
Bill unlike you I have in an earlier post provided the link and never denied making it.
At least I am owning up which is something you are not capable of and never have been able to correct your misleading statements to the press.
And these are comments you have pretty much said over the years as well as your east coast buddy, so there is nothing new in the message.
Bill
You should know about ruining someones reputation, and conspiring with others to do so.
I have records which indicate your actions while director where you went out of your way to ruin my reputation, and Roys, and others.
You are an evil person, who would do anything in order to make yourself look good.
You are also being sued for libel by another person who you attacked and made false accusations as to his character and knowledge. The records indicate you have a history of doing so.
As you well know you attempted to cozy up to Nick in order to make the National fly because you couldn’t get the numbers up. You will get in bed with anyone in order to accomplish your task. Just as you had CREA attempt to get inspectors licenced, and you had the support from your cronies in order to push your agenda.
Why do you suppose everything you touch backfires?
The biggest mistake made by the National was putting you in charge of being spokes person, given your propensity to back stab.
So are you stating Nick that the NHICC (NHI designation) was not recognized at the same level? And if your above statement holds true, than why were we told differently when “we” were in Alberta clearing the air on where our file went? Seems we heard a very different story at our Edmonton meeting. We were well received, and considered on top.
Even your buddies at CanNACHI and Inspect4U have openly admitted that they plagiarized and copied proprietary works of the NCP, even after cease and desist letters. That even indicates they couldn’t figure out how to do it; they had to stoop to that level of behaviour. So much for your claim of your higher standard. This can also lead to resolution in a different venue.
So what’s up with that and how does it offer credibility to your posting that we “had to recently seek approval from the licensing agency, much like other schools have to. You are now on par with Inspect4U (already approved). CMI didn’t have to apply.”
Perhaps you may even want to ask why INSPECT4U was not accredited.
I hear rumour that the bar is being raised, and furthermore the NHICC does not provide training. It recognizes accredited training from training providers that meet sound educational learning outcomes that have actually been mapped and independently reviewed.
You see certifying and training presents a conflict. Your buddy Raymond Wand points that out on a number of forum threads. Thus self-certifying and making members complete mandatory training through in many cases the same organization is simply supporting that conflict of interest, even if some of it is free!
That lack of transparency, can ultimately impact CMI’s. But thats for another day!
Even that raises more questions if you read the “regulations”. My understanding the rules and accountability is changing. What will happen when such changes impacts the CMI’s?
LOL that is a bunch of hog wash!
The fact remains regardless what he thinks Code Inspectors become qualified the minute they pass the open book proctored test. Even more poignant is the fact like home inspectors there are good and bad code inspectors who also report to their municipality, unlike inspectors in Ontario who report to know one.
And this person wants to teach other home inspectors? Now I think I understand why Mike Holmes was used to endorse the CD course in the Sault.
I do not want to teach Home Inspection. Are city is over run with so called HIs.
I offered to teach as I was the only one qualified to do so.
Mike Holmes has already made an impact here and persuaded the city to go with this 2 year home inspection diploma.
Don’t forget that he and others all support another organization not interNachi. The other individual causing trouble here is affiliated with that Organization. It will be interesting to see what will happen if they decide to use the same info from Carson Dunlop for the portion on Home Inspection. I am waiting patiently to see and have two students promising to keep me updated.
I may not be good at explaining everything I want to say but I am devoted to learn more everyday and have been doing so for over 10 years.
I have been told by clients that Code Officials here must be payed off by someone. I have even seen it myself. Too bad that some have become a race of people that don’t care.
Claude, the MICB couldn’t be more transparent. All of our applications are saved forever, even the envelopes they arrived in are now saved. They scanned and are made available to the AB government when they want to see them. We are both non-profit and Federally Tax Exempt. Our Federal 990 returns are published each year, online, for all to see. And we really don’t spend much money on operations anyway. We don’t even have paid staff. John and I do the work as volunteers.
The NCP scam on the other hand… LOL!
Nick - again prove the scam by facts, not posted inuendo. You are entitled to believe whatever you want.
Vive la’difference!
BTW: I have signed off of further postings, because trying to post here with your other buddies is a simple waste of time and a joke. Besides as Roy (NACHI GOD & GATEKEEPER) stated - I have contributed nothing!
Regards - Claude
Shame on you Claude you again are not telling the truth .
I did not say ("stated - I have contributed nothing! ")
see below in red is what I did say
Claude sorry to see you go you do have knowledge but unfortunatly you have not shared much lately .
http://www.nachi.org/forum/f48/bill-mullen-62391/index6.html#post812878 See post #82
![pinocchio[1].jpg](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/internachi/original/3X/e/f/efa9eac3edaee4181e10c5e9881c43bea16b7907.jpeg)
Still avoiding the facts , These people are not at arms length .
The following can be found at the first document attached TIPRBinder
clawrenson@acncanada.net
Address: Chief Examiner 396 Old Tecumseh Rd. Tecumseh, Ontario N8N 3S8
The second attachment contains the following (accredit11)
Claude
Humber Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning
(Inspection Support Services Inc version)Toronto, ON
Paul Wilson
The Home Inspectors Institute Ottawa, ON
Inspection Support Services **is owned by **
The People
Harry Janssen, R.H.I., C.E.S., R.B.T., National Certificate Holder
Claude Lawrenson, CMI, PHPI, R.H.I., R.S.W., B. Ed., National Certificate Holder
Ron Nokes, R.H.I., C.E.T., C.R.T., C.I.A.Q.T.
The Directors of Inspection Support Services Inc. offer over 75 years of collective experience representing a wealth of expertise and backgrounds in construction, inspection, energy managment, engineering technologies and post-secondary education. All of the Directors have served on provincial, national and industry related committees to help enhance and further the professional development of the housing and home inspection industry. At Inspection Support Services Inc. we utilize our expertise and extensive network of professionals, companies and educational specialists to fully realize the potential of your project.
Roy, and what is wrong with these people you named above? I graduated from Humber 10 years ago and with all my success in this business I owe much to the education I received in the college from the very same people that you named.