It’s good to see that there are other out there who can effectively break down an illogical argument into it’s proper components. I thought I was the only one left outside of academia who still uses “ad hominem” in its proper context. Very fine logical deconstruction.
I prefer to cut through the obvious BS and do not suffer fools lightly.
Once you learn effective (and pretty simple) debate techniques, you find out that most arguments, stripped of their illogic and fluff, are mostly broken down to “I don’t like you because you don’t agree with my feelings”.