Originally Posted By: vsantos This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
The certification he received was from an unknown correspondence school which appears to use NACHI’s entrance exam as their final exam and is in no way connected to NACHI.
Nick, will you be contacting that School and telling them not to use the exam?
Is this attention to NACHI good or are they trying to make a point that the exam is too easy? I personally like the new exam and feel there are some good questions that I would not have been able to answer without the formal training I received with ITA.
I can only hope you do this profession justice when the meeting occurs. In fact, why don't you ask us members for particular points we think you should bring up.
For example, the fact that the exam in no way decides whether or not you are ready to be an inspector.
Originally Posted By: aslimack This post was automatically imported from our archived forum.
Nick,
Tell me your not STILL clueless on this. Is the new $289 a pop more important than the sustained $289 a pop from what would have been renewed memberships, had the credibility of the members been protected with a little common sense?